The system is in process of an upgrade. Login access during this period is restricted. This notice will be removed when service is returned to normal.
Comparison of Orbit Propagators in the Research and Development Goddard Trajectory Determination System (R & D GTDS). Part I: Simulated Data
Fonte, Daniel J., Jr.
Danielson, D. A.
Dyar, W. R.
MetadataShow full item record
This paper evaluates the performance of various orbit propagation theories for arti cial earth satellites in di erent orbital regimes Speci cally R& D GTDS s Cowell numerical technique DSST semianalytical technique SGP , SGP4, and Brouwer-Lyddane (analytic techniques) orbit propagators are compared for decaying circular (~200 km perigee height ), low altitude circular (590 km perigee height ), high altitude circular (1340 km perigee height), Molniya and geosynchronous orbits. All test cases implement a one orbital period differential correction fit to simulated data derived from a Cowell truth trajectory. These fits are followed by a one orbital period predict with the DC solve-for vector. Trajectory comparisons are made with the Cowell "truth " trajectory over both the fit and predict spans . Computation time and RMS errors are used as comparison metrics. The Unix-based version of R& D GTDS ( NPS SUN Sparc 10) is the test platform used in this analysis .
R&D GTDS is Draper Laboratory's research-based orbit determination testbed. This analysis tool evolved from its R&D counterpart at the Gooddard Space Flight Center. Dr. Paul Cefola, Program Manager at Draper Laboratory and Lecturer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, has overseen the development and expansion of this testbed (by a team of scientists at Draper Laboratory and a continuing string of graduate students at MIT) over the past twenty years (see Fonte). In its current form, R&D GTDS is capable of performing...