Publication:
Funding for Life: When to Spend the Acquisition Pot

dc.contributor.authorGill, Kate
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Kirsty Carter
dc.contributor.corporateResearch and Sponsored Programs Office (RSPO)
dc.contributor.corporateAcquisition Management (AM)
dc.contributor.corporateAcquisition Research Program (ARP)
dc.contributor.departmentAcquisition Management
dc.contributor.departmentOther Research Faculty
dc.date30-Apr-10
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-08T21:20:16Z
dc.date.available2013-05-08T21:20:16Z
dc.date.issued2010-04-30
dc.descriptionProceedings Paper (for Acquisition Research Program)en_US
dc.description.abstractThe UK Ministry of Defence (MoD) spends ''2.6 billion per year (MoD, 2008, Section 1.2; 2007, p. 2) on research and development (R&D) (''Defense Technology,'' 2009, p. 22). The figure is technically correct, but it conceals more than it reveals. Of the total, the MoD spends around ''500 million (MoD, 2006, p. 8) on laboratory research and on taking what emerges from the lab in its first few steps down the long road that leads eventually to mature technology embedded in military equipment. Analysis based on UK National Audit Office (NAO) data (Stationery Office, 2006, November 24; 2008, p. 5) shows that about half of project timescale overruns are due to technology maturation occurring too late (Jordan & Dowdy, 2007, p. 16). US evidence shows that defence projects that get all their technology mature before the equivalent of Main Gate suffer only very small time and cost overruns thereafter (GAO, 2007, pp. 14-15). The first hypothesis would be that funding for technology development occurs too late in the acquisition process, when the problems that inevitably occur have a disproportionate effect on project timescales and costs. However, is this construct based on project failings or funding process failures? To improve the outcome, could we simply improve the timing allocation of funds? This research examines the profile of funding as aligned to maturity levels of technology and system and integration readiness, and makes proposals on the improvements that could be made.en_US
dc.description.distributionstatementApproved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
dc.description.sponsorshipNaval Postgraduate School Acquisition Research Programen_US
dc.identifier.npsreportNPS-AM-10-060
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10945/33493
dc.publisherMonterey, California. Naval Postgraduate Schoolen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAcquisition Research Symposium
dc.rightsThis publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.en_US
dc.subject.authorBudgetingen_US
dc.subject.authorFinance, acquisition, maturity, maturity levels, timescales, system readiness, audit, MoD; ministry of defence; defence, defense, systems engineering, Dstl; Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, National Audit Office, NAOen_US
dc.titleFunding for Life: When to Spend the Acquisition Poten_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication6b655e58-5689-4419-8db8-562f3b19b2d0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication394ae3f1-b0b4-47ac-ba4b-b6ea3bc4dab9
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationbc7988c8-57ff-485c-9348-877f4ef91f4e
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoverybc7988c8-57ff-485c-9348-877f4ef91f4e
relation.isSeriesOfPublicatione652aa3b-f22b-4814-8e9d-6391f82531e0
relation.isSeriesOfPublication.latestForDiscoverye652aa3b-f22b-4814-8e9d-6391f82531e0
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
NPS-AM-10-060.pdf
Size:
404.15 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format