Publication:
The Budget Enforcement Act in 1991: Isometric Budgeting

dc.contributor.authorDoyle, Richard
dc.contributor.authorMcCaffery, Jerry
dc.contributor.departmentAdministrative Sciences
dc.dateSpring 1992
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-14T22:27:03Z
dc.date.available2014-10-14T22:27:03Z
dc.date.issued1992-02
dc.description.abstractThe immediate effect of the Budget Enforcement Act (BEA) of 1990 was to cancel a pending $110 billion sequester and to change the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings deficit targets. These and other changes allowed Congress and the administration to escape responsibility for increases in the deficit if discretionary spending was kept within the caps and no new entitlement programs or revenue enhancements were added. This assumption and others relating to the empowerment of the Appropriations Committees and the new authority of the OMB are explored in this article.en_US
dc.identifier.citationPublic Budgeting & Finance / Spring 1992
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10945/43499
dc.rightsThis publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.en_US
dc.titleThe Budget Enforcement Act in 1991: Isometric Budgetingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files