Publication:
An empirical comparison of software fault tolerance and fault elimination

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Authors
Shimeall, Tomothy J.
Leveson, Nancy
Subjects
Advisors
Date of Issue
1989-07
Date
Publisher
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
Language
en_US
Abstract
Reliability is an important concern in the development of software for modern systems. Some researchers have hypothesized that particular fault-handling approaches or techniques are so effective that other approaches or techniques are superfluous. The authors have performed a study that compares two major approaches to the improvement of software, software fault elimination and software fault tolerance, by examination of the fault detection obtained by five techniques: run-time assertions, multi-version voting, functional testing augmented by structural testing, code reading by stepwise abstraction, and static data-flow analysis. This study has focused on characterizing the sets of faults detected by the techniques and on characterizing the relationships between these sets of faults. The results of the study show that none of the techniques studied is necessarily redundant to any combination of the others. Further results reveal strengths and weakness in the fault detection by the techniques studied and suggest directions for future research
Type
Technical Report
Description
Series/Report No
Department
Computer Science
Identifiers
NPS Report Number
NPS-52-89-047
Sponsors
Funder
O&MN, Direct Funding
Format
Citation
Distribution Statement
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
Rights
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.
Collections