Innovative Measures for the Evaluation of Command and Control Architectures
Loading...
Authors
Hutchins, Susan G.
Kemple, William G.
Entin, Elliot E.
Serfaty, Daniel
Subjects
Advisors
Date of Issue
1998
Date
1998
Publisher
Language
Abstract
Several principles of warfare have been developed through experience over time. These principles provide a
framework that can be used to assess model-derived command and control architectures from a military
perspective. This paper will dis-cuss and present analysis of data collected on participants’ ratings of three
model-based archi-tectures on the principles of warfare to determine quantitative differences among the
architectures. Comparisons of these ratings with critical dimen-sions used by modelers to optimize the
architec-tures will be discussed, including feedback provid-ed during after-action reviews from military personnel
who operated under these organizational architectures when responding to computer-driven scenarios.
The objective was to compare the advantages and disadvantages of the three model-derived architectures vis-à-
vis military principles.
Type
Conference Paper
Description
Proceedings for the 1998 Command
and Control Research and Technology Symposium
Command and Control for the Next Millenium
June 29-July1, 1998
Naval Postgraduate School
Monterey, California
Track 1 Architectures
Series/Report No
Department
Organization
Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.)
Identifiers
NPS Report Number
Sponsors
Cognitive and Neural Science Technology Division of ONR
Funder
Format
22 p.
Citation
Distribution Statement
Rights
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.