Archives and Inference Documentary Evidence in Case Study Research and the Debate over U.S. Entry into World War II
Loading...
Authors
Darnton, Christopher
Subjects
Advisors
Date of Issue
2018
Date
Publisher
MIT Press
Language
Abstract
Did Franklin Delano Roosevelt escalate confliict with Japan and Germany before Pearl Harbor, or did he attempt to avoid war? To what extent did U.S. public opinion influence these decisions? And, crucially, how do we know? Scholars offer diametrically opposed analyses of this historical case, bearing directly on international relations theories regarding the effects of democracy on war and foreign policy. In this debate and the broader security studies field, scholars increasingly employ published and archival primary sources. Because researchers lack a clear template for descriptive and causal inference with documentary evidence, though, such work is indeterminate and ultimately unpersuasive. How can political scientists approach archives and primary documents more effectively and efficiently? Above all, case studies need stronger research designs and clearer source selection strategies, not just more authoritative documents. A critical review of the sources cited in recent scholarship in the debate leading to the United States' entry into World War II, and a replication analysis of a key portion of the documentary record, underscores this need for improved research design and buttresses eight guidelines for the selection and analysis of textual evidence in case study research.
Type
Article
Description
The article of record as published may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00306
Series/Report No
Department
National Security Affairs (NSA)
Organization
Identifiers
NPS Report Number
Sponsors
Funder
Format
43 p.
Citation
Darnton, Christopher. "Archives and Inference: Documentary Evidence in Case Study Research and the Debate over US Entry into World War II." International Security 42.3 (2018): 84-126.
Distribution Statement
Rights
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.