Endogenous split awards as a bid protest and procurement management tool
Loading...
Authors
Coughlan, Peter J.
Gates, William
Subjects
Contract protests
bid protests
split procurement
contract
bid protests
split procurement
contract
Advisors
Date of Issue
2012-07-18
Date
July 18, 2012
Publisher
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
Language
Abstract
This research explores split procurement awards as a tool to rationalize the
bid protest process and potentially improve the general procurement process. It
discusses split procurement as an award protest and procurement management
tool, and models bidding incentives and outcomes with both fixed or exogenous split
awards and variable or endogenous split awards (where the split depends on the
relative competitiveness of the vendors’ bids). Endogenous split awards can
increase the competitiveness of vendor bids relative to fixed-split awards, while
reducing the incentives for frivolous contract protests. Endogenously split contract
awards can also improve the general acquisition process, particularly if retaining
competition is important for follow-on procurement actions.
Type
Technical Report
Description
Acquisition Research Sponsored Report Series
Disclaimer: The views represented in this report are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy position of the Navy, the Department of Defense, or the Federal Government.
Disclaimer: The views represented in this report are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy position of the Navy, the Department of Defense, or the Federal Government.
Series/Report No
Acquisition Research Symposium
Department
Contract Management
Organization
Contract Management (CM)
Acquisition Research Program (ARP)
Identifiers
NPS Report Number
NPS-CM-12-180
Sponsors
Naval Postgraduate School Acquisition Research Program
Funder
Format
Citation
Distribution Statement
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
Rights
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.