Making Terrorism Risk Analysis Less Harmful and More Useful: Another Try (Response)
Loading...
Authors
Brown, G.
Cox, L.
Subjects
Decision Support and Risk Management
Advisors
Date of Issue
2011
Date
2011
Publisher
Language
Abstract
Although Ezell claims that we only “repackaged in a new article the limitations identified by Ezell et al. of PRA in terrorism risk analysis,” he neither ad- dresses nor refutes any of our substantive technical points and examples, and his comments reflect a fundamental lack of understanding of our main ideas. We are therefore grateful for this opportunity to clarify our reasoning in light of his comments, as follows.
Type
Article
Description
Risk Analysis, 31, pp. 193-195.
The article of record as published may be located at http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01563.x
Center for Infrastructure Defense (CID) Paper.
The article of record as published may be located at http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01563.x
Center for Infrastructure Defense (CID) Paper.
Series/Report No
Department
Department of Operations Research
Organization
Identifiers
NPS Report Number
Sponsors
Funding
Format
Citation
Brown, G., and Cox, L., 2011, “Making Terrorism Risk Analysis Less Harmful and More Useful: Another Try,” Risk Analysis, 31, pp. 193-195.
Distribution Statement
Rights
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.