Critical Infrastructure as Complex Emergent Systems

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Authors
Lewis, Ted G.
Center for Homeland Defense and Security
Mechanical Engineering Department
Subjects
Advisors
Date of Issue
2011
Date
Publisher
Language
Abstract
The United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is charged with “build[ing] a safer, more secure, and more resilient America by enhancing protection of the Nation’s Critical infrastructure and key resources (CI/KR) …” using an all-hazards approach. The effective implementation of this strategy hinges upon our understanding of catastrophes and their potential effect on the functioning of our infrastructure. Unfortunately, there has been no unifying theory of catastrophe to guide decisionmaking, preparedness, or response. We do not know, for example, why some catastrophes are “worse” than others, or if the rate of catastrophes is increasing or decreasing. Furthermore, DHS has adopted a risk-informed decision-making process, but has done so without defining key terms, such as “risk”, or quantifying the primary elements of risk – definitions that are badly needed before setting a course of action and allocating resources. We present a framework, based upon network science and normal accident theory that can be used to guide policy decisions for homeland security. We show that exceedance probability, which is commonly used by the insurance industry to set hazard insurance premiums, provides a unifying policy framework for homeland security investments. Furthermore, since the exceedance probability for catastrophic consequences obeys a power law, we define resilience, explicitly, as the exponent of that power law. This allows a mathematical definition of resilience that resonates with our innate sense of resilience. That is, the more resilient a given system, the larger it’s resiliency exponent. Such an approach also allows one to classify hazards as ‘high’ or ‘low’ risk, according to the resiliency exponent, and to guide investments towards prevention or response. This framework provides a more rigorous foundation for Federal investment decisions and a rational basis for policies to best protect the Nation’s infrastructure.
Type
Article
Description
Series/Report No
Department
Organization
Identifiers
NPS Report Number
Sponsors
Funding
Format
Citation
Distribution Statement
Rights
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.
Collections