On the treatment of force‐level constraints in time-sequential combat problems

Authors
Taylor, James G.
Advisors
Second Readers
Subjects
Date of Issue
1975-12
Date
December 1975
Publisher
Wiley
Language
Abstract
The treatment of force‐level constraints in time‐sequential combat optimization problems is illustrated by further studying the fire‐programming problem of Isbell and Marlow. By using the theory of state variable inequality constraints from modern optimal control theory, sharper results are obtained on necessary conditions of optimality for an optimal fire‐distribution policy (in several cases justifying conjectures made in previous analysis). This leads to simplification of the determination of the domains of controllability for extremals leading to the various terminal states of combat. (Additionally, some new results for the determination of boundary conditions for the adjoint variables in optimal control problems with state variable inequality constraints have arisen from this work.) Some further extensions of previous analysis of the fire‐programming problem are also given. These clarify some key points in the solution synthesis. Some important military principles for target selection and the valuation of combat resources are deduced from the solution. As a result of this work, more general time‐sequential combat optimization problems can be handled, and a more systematic solution procedure is developed.
Type
Article
Description
The article of record as published may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nav.3800220402
Series/Report No
Department
Organization
Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.)
Identifiers
NPS Report Number
Sponsors
Office of Naval Research as part of the Foundation Research Program
Funding
Project Order No. 2-0150
Format
34 p.
Citation
Taylor, James G. "On the treatment of force‐level constraints in times‐equential combat problems." Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 22.4 (1975): 617-650.
Distribution Statement
Rights
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.
Collections