Portfolio analysis of delivery and finance methods in US Navy family housing

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Authors
Medved, Marko.
Subjects
Advisors
Date of Issue
2000-09
Date
Publisher
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
Language
en_US
Abstract
This thesis proposes the use of several project and portfolio tools that demonstrate the advantages of integrated delivery and finance methods. It also depicts several strategic frameworks by which to shape internal organization and procurement structure in order to attract innovative private sector forces. Two decision support tools were used to analyze Navy housing portfolios at eight installations. First, solicitations, operations and maintenance budget histories, and project programs were collected. This information was assembled in CHOICES decision support software to analyze portfolio cash flows for varying configurations of delivery and finance methods. Next, several construction contract method selection tools were used to illustrate how the same bases could narrow choice of delivery methods based on specific regional, project and market drivers. This process illustrated several plausible delivery types for specific projects in lieu of relying upon predetermined methods. Several strategic frameworks were outlined and used to analyze the Naval Facilities and Engineering Command's (NAVFAC) internal structure and its housing procurement and sustainment strategies. First, the case studies were reviewed in light of fundamental principles for public procurement strategy. Results of this assessment call for focus on increasing competition and innovation, maintaining transparency and leveraging private capital. Next, basic frameworks of competitive private sector strategies were used to analyze NAVFAC's organizational and acquisition structures. This process yielded several proposals that would align organization and solicitation configurations to create more attractive infrastructure markets for private industry
Type
Thesis
Description
Series/Report No
Department
Organization
Identifiers
NPS Report Number
Sponsors
Funder
Format
155 leaves;28 cm.
Citation
Distribution Statement
Rights
Collections