Making U.S. security and privacy rights compatible

dc.contributor.advisorSimeral, Robert
dc.contributor.advisorBellavita, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorClarke, David A., Jr.
dc.contributor.departmentNational Security Affairs
dc.dateSep-13
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-20T23:35:59Z
dc.date.available2013-11-20T23:35:59Z
dc.date.issued2013-09
dc.descriptionCHDS State/Localen_US
dc.descriptionReissued in March 2018 to clarify attribution.
dc.descriptionA Naval Postgraduate School Master's Thesis
dc.description.abstractThe terror attacks against the United States on September 11, 2001, necessitated changes in the way domestic intelligence agencies and services conducted information-collection activities to protect against further attacks. Congress acted quickly to prevent the next attack by expanding government authority under the USA PATRIOT Act and the Federal Intelligence Surveillance Court. This gave domestic intelligence services the tools needed due to advances in technology that allowed terror organizations and suspects to travel, communicate, raise money and recruit using the Internet. Safeguards were written into the enhanced authority to protect against privacy abuses by government. Ten years after 9/11, civil-liberties advocates called for more transparency, more privacy protections and better oversight because of past abuses by government officials operating in the name of national security. Leaks about government spying on U.S. citizens have heightened the balance debate between security and privacy. Privacy or security is not a zero-sum game. A policy that incorporates an adversarial process in the FISC and a streamlined oversight mechanism in Congress for more effective oversight, and the release of redacted classified documents to educate the public about surveillance techniques, would instill more balance and greater public trust.en_US
dc.description.distributionstatementApproved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
dc.description.serviceSheriff, Milwaukee, WIen_US
dc.description.urihttp://archive.org/details/makingussecurity1094537603
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10945/37603
dc.publisherMonterey California. Naval Postgraduate Schoolen_US
dc.rightsCopyright is reserved by the copyright owner.en_US
dc.subject.authorUSA PATRIOT Acten_US
dc.subject.authorFederal Intelligence Surveillance Courten_US
dc.subject.authorDomestic Intelligence Servicesen_US
dc.subject.authorOversighten_US
dc.subject.authorAdversarial Processen_US
dc.subject.authorSurveillance Techniquesen_US
dc.subject.authorPrivacyen_US
dc.subject.authorInformation Collectionen_US
dc.titleMaking U.S. security and privacy rights compatibleen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
etd.thesisdegree.disciplineSecurity Studies (Homeland Defense And Security)en_US
etd.thesisdegree.grantorNaval Postgraduate Schoolen_US
etd.thesisdegree.levelMastersen_US
etd.thesisdegree.nameMaster of Arts in Security Studies (Homeland Defense And Security)en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
13Sep_Clarke_David_Reissue 2018.pdf
Size:
905.13 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections