Unique maximum property of the Stirling numbers of the second kind
Loading...
Authors
Bleick, Willard Evan
Wang, Peter C. C.
Advisors
Second Readers
Subjects
Stirling number of the second kind
Unique Maximum property
Hermite's formula for finite differences
Unique Maximum property
Hermite's formula for finite differences
Date of Issue
1977-01-25
Date
1/25/1977
Publisher
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
Language
Abstract
Letting f(n) and (n) be the first and last maxim of the graph S(n,k); k = 1, 2, ... , n, Kanold [J. Reine Angew. Math 230 (1968), 211-212] shows that, for sufficiently large n, n/log n < f(n) = (n) = n h(n)/log n with h(n) subject only to h(n) [to infinity] as n [to infinity]. This result was subsequently improved by Harborth {J. Reine Angew. Math 230 (1968), 213-214} to yield lim f(n)nᄍlog n = lim (n)nᄍlog n = 1. Together with Harper's result , it is concluded that S(n,k) have, asymptotically, a single maximum. Lieb [J. of Comb. Theory 5 (1968), 203-206] shows that Stirling numbers of the second kind possess the property of Strong Logarithmic Concavity, and thus are unimodal. Dobsn [J. of Comb. Theory 5 (1968). 212-214 and 7 (1969), 116-121] shows a similar result in a stronger form. However, the classical problem of establishing that S(n,k) possesses a "unique" maximum for all n >/= 3 remains unsolved. It is the purpose of this paper to provide the complete solution of this classical problem
Type
Technical Report
Description
Series/Report No
Department
Organization
Identifiers
NPS Report Number
NPS-53BL77011
Sponsors
Office of Naval Research
Contract No. NR-042-286
Funding
Format
Citation
Distribution Statement
Rights
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.
