Convergence of the costates does not imply convergence of the control
Loading...
Authors
Fahroo, Fahroo
Ross, Michael I.
Advisors
Second Readers
Subjects
Date of Issue
2008
Date
Publisher
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
Language
Abstract
Solving an optimal control problem using a digital computer implies discrete approximations. Since the 1960s, there have been well-documented [1–3] naïve applications of Pontryagin’s principle in the discrete domain. Although its incorrect applications continue to this day, the origin of the naïvete is quite understandable because one has a reasonable expectation of the validity of Pontryagin’s principle within a discrete domain. That an application of the Hamiltonian minimization condition is not necessarily valid in a discrete domain [1,4] opens up a vast array of questions in theory and computation [2,5]. These questions continue to dominate the meaning and validity of discrete approximations and computational solutions to optimal control problems [6–10]. Among these questions is the convergence of discrete approximations in optimal control.
Type
Article
Description
Series/Report No
Organization
Identifiers
NPS Report Number
Sponsors
U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR)
Funding
AFOSR grant F1ATA0-60-6-2G002.
Format
6 p.
Citation
Fahroo, F. & Ross, I.M. 2008, "Convergence of the costates does not imply convergence of the control", Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1492-1497.
Distribution Statement
Rights
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.
