Budgeting for National Defense Acquisition: assessing system linkage and the impact of transformation

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Authors
Jones, Lawrence R.
McCaffery, Jerry
Fierstine, Kory L.
Advisors
Second Readers
Subjects
Armed Forces Procurement
Weapons systems
Date of Issue
2005-06-30
Date
Publisher
Monterey, CA; Naval Postgraduate School
Language
Abstract
In this article we conduct a processual analysis (Barzelay, 2003; Barzelay & Gallego, 2005) to assess evidence and test the following hypothesis: the complicated architecture and processes of national defense planning, programming, budgeting and execution and the defense acquisition decision system lead to unintended and negative consequences for defense acquisition and procurement. The purpose of this article is to identify key points of linkage weakness or failure between DoD financial management and acquisition decision systems. We first describe the PPB system and decision process. We then provide an analysis of recent changes to PPB. Next, we describe the defense acquisition system (DAS) in detail. This leads us, by drawing on interview data, to identify systems linkages and areas of misalignment between the PPBES and the DAS. Finally, we provide conclusions with respect to our hypothesis, analysis of consequent key problems and issues, and areas that require further research.
Type
Technical Report
Description
Series/Report No
Department
Identifiers
NPS Report Number
NPS-GSBPP-05-008
Sponsors
PEO SHIPS
Funding
Format
xii, 69 p.: ill. (some col.);28 cm.
Citation
Distribution Statement
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
Rights
Collections