Army materiel requirements documents: qualitative analysis of efficiency and effectiveness
Loading...
Authors
Ha, Anh H.
Costa, Nathaniel P.
Advisors
Fast, William R.
Hansen, Jason K.
Second Readers
Subjects
Requirements Generation System (RGS)
Joint Capabilities Integration Development System (JCIDS)
Initial Capability Document (ICD)
Capability Development Document (CDD)
Capability Production Document (CPD)
Mission Need Statement (MNS)
Operation Need Statement (ONS)
Army Materiel Requirements Document (MRD)
Army Materiel Capability Document (MCD)
efficiency and effectiveness
Better Buying Power 2.0
Joint Capabilities Integration Development System (JCIDS)
Initial Capability Document (ICD)
Capability Development Document (CDD)
Capability Production Document (CPD)
Mission Need Statement (MNS)
Operation Need Statement (ONS)
Army Materiel Requirements Document (MRD)
Army Materiel Capability Document (MCD)
efficiency and effectiveness
Better Buying Power 2.0
Date of Issue
2013-06
Date
Publisher
Monterey, CA; Naval Postgraduate School
Language
Abstract
The U.S. Army must maximize the efficiency and effectiveness of the documents that facilitate successful materiel requirements generation for the warfighter. Throughout the last decade, incremental modifications to policies and procedures have resulted in changes to the mandatory materiel requirement documents. These incessant changes have forced continuous revisions to the requirements generation process and materiel requirements documents over the last decade. Consequently, many factors are constraining the future of the Armys requirements generation process as the Global War on Terror comes to a close. This project examines the benefits and shortfalls of past and present materiel requirements documents. It examines these requirements documents based on their efficiency and effectiveness for key stakeholders. The project also weighs these documents against current initiatives for best practices in the DoD. Subsequently, a comparative analysis is performed on requirement documents for three ground vehicles that have been either produced or projected for production. Recommendations for changes to future requirements documents are presented.
Type
Thesis
Description
Series/Report No
Department
Identifiers
NPS Report Number
Sponsors
Funding
Format
Citation
Distribution Statement
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
Rights
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.
