Should promotion to captain within the United States Army become decentralized?.

dc.contributor.advisorMcGonigal, Richard A.
dc.contributor.authorLauderdale, Larry
dc.contributor.corporateNaval Postgraduate School (U.S.)
dc.contributor.departmentAdministrative Sciences
dc.contributor.secondreaderCreighton, John W.
dc.dateJune 1983
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-19T23:59:58Z
dc.date.available2012-11-19T23:59:58Z
dc.date.issued1983-06
dc.description.abstractThis thesis analyzes the current policy for promotion to Captain in the United States Army under the centralized process at Department of the Army (DA) level in accordance with DA Pam 600-3. The study of CPTs promotions contained in this thesis is limited to the current active duty promotion system for commissioned officers. The intent of this study is to determine whether or not the CPTs Promotion Process should remain centralized at Department of the Army level or become decentralized down at the individual's unit commanders level in the field. Several implications for change are discussed. This study also looks at the promotion process as it relates to the Future Army Regimental system that has been approved in principal by the Army Chief of staff, General Edward C. Meyers.
dc.description.distributionstatementApproved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
dc.description.funderDepartment of the Army, U.S. Army Military Personnel Center
dc.description.serviceCaptain, United States Army
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartment of the Army, U.S. Army Military Personnel Center
dc.description.urihttp://archive.org/details/shouldpromotiont00laud
dc.identifier.npsreportNPS-54-83-004
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10945/19981
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherMonterey, California. Naval Postgraduate Schoolen_US
dc.rightsThis publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.
dc.subject.authorcentralizationen_US
dc.subject.authordecentralizationen_US
dc.subject.authorpromotionen_US
dc.subject.authorselection processen_US
dc.subject.authorfield commanderen_US
dc.subject.authorselection boarden_US
dc.subject.authorchangeen_US
dc.subject.authorstructureen_US
dc.subject.authorsystemen_US
dc.subject.authorprocessen_US
dc.subject.authormethodologyen_US
dc.subject.authortriangulationen_US
dc.subject.authorarchival dataen_US
dc.subject.authoranalysisen_US
dc.subject.authormanagementen_US
dc.subject.authorhierarchyen_US
dc.subject.authorexpectationen_US
dc.subject.authorattitudeen_US
dc.subject.authorbeliefsen_US
dc.subject.authorneedsen_US
dc.subject.authorcultureen_US
dc.subject.authorvaluesen_US
dc.subject.authorperceptionsen_US
dc.subject.authortotal systemen_US
dc.subject.lcshManagementen_US
dc.titleShould promotion to captain within the United States Army become decentralized?.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
etd.thesisdegree.disciplineManagementen_US
etd.thesisdegree.grantorNaval Postgraduate Schoolen_US
etd.thesisdegree.levelMastersen_US
etd.thesisdegree.nameM.S. in Managementen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
shouldpromotiont00laud.pdf
Size:
4.75 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Collections