AN ANALYSIS OF THE PRIMARY DRIVER FOR CHINA’S BELT AND ROAD INITIATIVE—SECURITY VERSUS ECONOMICS
dc.contributor.advisor | Glosny, Michael A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Whitman, Jamie N. | |
dc.contributor.department | National Security Affairs (NSA) | |
dc.contributor.secondreader | Khan, Feroz H. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-10-26T19:20:51Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-10-26T19:20:51Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-09 | |
dc.description.abstract | China portrays the Belt and Road Initiative—an interconnected network of rail lines, oil and gas pipelines, roads, bridges, and port facilities designed to connect China with Central Asia, the Middle East, Africa, and Europe—as an effort aimed at regional economic integration with win-win outcomes for every country involved. The China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is the flagship project of the Belt and Road Initiative, consisting of rail lines, fiber optic cables, power plants, and the Gwadar Port facility. CPEC provides the most tangible infrastructure projects to evaluate. Critics argue that it is a Chinese neocolonial effort to exert Chinese influence and increase Chinese power globally, burdening poor and developing countries with dangerous amounts of debt. Chinese internal and external security concerns, such as violence in Xinjiang and the perceived “Malacca Dilemma,” are also discussed as important drivers for the Belt and Road Initiative and CPEC. This thesis examines both economic and security arguments to address the question: What is the primary driver for China’s Belt and Road Initiative and the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor? The research shows that security is the primary driver for these projects. Economic considerations and benefits are also important to Chinese leaders, but security considerations trump economic ones. | en_US |
dc.description.distributionstatement | Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. | |
dc.description.service | Lieutenant Commander, United States Navy | en_US |
dc.description.uri | http://archive.org/details/ananalysisofthep1094560362 | |
dc.identifier.thesisid | 30350 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10945/60362 | |
dc.publisher | Monterey, CA; Naval Postgraduate School | en_US |
dc.rights | This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States. | en_US |
dc.subject.author | BRI | en_US |
dc.subject.author | Belt and Road | en_US |
dc.subject.author | One Belt One Road | en_US |
dc.subject.author | Belt and Road Initiative | en_US |
dc.subject.author | Maritime Silk Road | en_US |
dc.subject.author | String of Pearls | en_US |
dc.subject.author | OBOR | en_US |
dc.subject.author | CPEC | en_US |
dc.subject.author | China | en_US |
dc.subject.author | Pakistan | en_US |
dc.subject.author | China Pakistan Economic Corridor | en_US |
dc.title | AN ANALYSIS OF THE PRIMARY DRIVER FOR CHINA’S BELT AND ROAD INITIATIVE—SECURITY VERSUS ECONOMICS | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
etd.thesisdegree.discipline | Security Studies (Far East, Southeast Asia, the Pacific) | en_US |
etd.thesisdegree.grantor | Naval Postgraduate School | en_US |
etd.thesisdegree.level | Masters | en_US |
etd.thesisdegree.name | Master of Arts in Security Studies (Far East, Southeast Asia, the Pacific) | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1