Lot Splitting in Stochastic Flow Shop and Job Shop Environments
Loading...
Authors
Smunt, Timothy L.
Buss, Arnold H.
Kropp, Dean H.
Subjects
Job Shop Scheduling
Lot Splitting
Machine Scheduling and Sequencing
Process Design
Simulation
Lot Splitting
Machine Scheduling and Sequencing
Process Design
Simulation
Advisors
Date of Issue
1996
Date
Spring 1996
Publisher
Language
Abstract
In recent years many firms have been implementing small lot size production. Lot
splitting breaks large orders into smaller transfer lots and offers the ability to move
parts more quickly through the production process. This paper extends the deterministic
studies by investigating various lot splitting policies in both stochastic job
shop and stochastic flow shop settings using performance measures of mean flow
time and the standard deviation of flow time. Using a computer simulation experiment,
we found that in stochastic dynamic job shops, the number of lot splits is more important
than the exact fonn of splitting. However, when optimal job sizes are determined for
each scenario, we found a few circumstances where the implementation of a small
initial split, called a "flag," can provide measurable improvement in flow time
performance. Interestingly, the vast majority of previous research indicates that
methods other than equal lot splitting typically improves makespan performance.
The earlier research, however, has been set in the static, deterministic flow shop
environment. Thus, our results are of practical interest since they show that the
specific method of lot splitting is important in only a small set of realistic environments
while the choice of an appropriate number of splits is typically more important.
Type
Article
Description
Series/Report No
Department
Operations Research
Organization
Identifiers
NPS Report Number
Sponsors
Funder
Format
Citation
Decision Sciences, Volume 27, Number 2, Spring 1996, pp. 215-238
Distribution Statement
Rights
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.