The ignition transient in small solid propellant rocket motors of practical configuration
Loading...
Authors
Lukenas, Leo Allen
Subjects
Advisors
Summerfield, Martin
Date of Issue
1967
Date
July 1967
Publisher
Princeton, New Jersey; Princeton University
Language
en_US
Abstract
An understanding of the ignition transient of a solid propellant rocket motor becomes increasingly more important as larger and more sophisticated solid propellant rocket motors are developed. Cost considerations alone require the minimal use of empirical methods in rocket development. Consideration of structural strength limitations, possible critical trajectory guidance and vehicle attitude control requirements, and the problem of ignition shock to sensitive instrumentation require that the ignition transient response be known and used as a basis for design. The ignition transient includes the entire time from initiation of the ignition signal to the attainment of design operating conditions within the rocket motor. The ignition transient can be separated into three intervals: the ignition lag interval - the delay between the initial ignition signal and the igniting of the first propellant element; the flame spreading interval - the time required for the propellant surface to become wholly ignited following first ignition; and the chamber filling interval - the time from completion of flame spreading to the attainment of design operating conditions.
This research is the logical extension of the modified ignition transient prediction theory of Summerfield, Parker, and Most to small solid
propellant rocket motors with practical configurations. The object was to design, develop, and test-fire small rocket motors with practical configurations using a realistic igniter and to compare the experimental results with
computer predicted ignition transients. Two case bonded motors were developed, one with a circular port and the other with a star shape port. A combined total of 57 circular and star shape motors were tested using various exit nozzle areas and propellant grain lengths of 3.5, 7.625, and 9.5 inches. A large discrepancy was found between the predicted and experimental results in the flame spreading interval, with a smaller difference occurring in the chamber filling interval. Three possible reasons are considered for the slow pressure rise; back flame spreading, back chamber
filling, and cooling-off of the igniter gas as it flows along the motor length. Based on diagnostic firing runs, it was determined that back flame spreading did not occur and that back chamber filling was only a minor contributor to the slow pressure rise. Cooling-off of the igniter gas is considered the major probable cause for the slow pressure increase.
Completion of flame spreading was determined to take place after 50% of the equilibrium chamber pressure was reached. This indicates a need to assign equal importance to the flame spreading and chamber filling intervals when considering ways to control the ignition transient.
The ignition prediction theory of Summerfield, Parker, and Most appears to be fundamentally
correct. The results of this research indicate a need for refinement in the theory, particularly in
the flame spreading interval in order to better predict the performance of rocket motors of practical configuration.
Type
Thesis
Description
This thesis document was issued under the authority of another institution, not NPS. At the time it was written, a copy was added to the NPS Library Collection for reasons not now known. It has been included in the digital archive for its historical value to NPS. Not believed to be a CIVINS (Civilian Institutions) title.
Series/Report No
Department
Aerospace and Mechanical Sciences
Organization
Princeton University
Identifiers
NPS Report Number
Sponsors
Funder
Format
Citation
Distribution Statement
Rights
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.