COMPARING PROMOTION OUTCOMES FOR NAVY SUPPLY CORPS OFFICERS BY COMMUNITY VALUES

dc.contributor.advisorSchwartz, Brett M.
dc.contributor.advisorShen, Yu-Chu
dc.contributor.authorChirinos, Jose G.
dc.contributor.authorCollins, Daniel H.
dc.contributor.authorSolarte, Andres F.
dc.contributor.corporateDepartment of Defense Management (DDM)
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Defense Management (DDM)
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Defense Management (DDM)
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Defense Management (DDM)
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-19T22:56:42Z
dc.date.available2024-02-19T22:56:42Z
dc.date.issued2023-12
dc.description.abstractThe May 2023 Office of Personnel Monthly update identified that 35% of Lieutenants and Lieutenant Commanders and 38% of Commanders believe boards do not pick the best candidates (Office of Supply Corps Personnel, 2023b). These statistics question the boards’ use of the communities' values in the O-4, O-5, and O-6 promotion boards. This Capstone Project uses descriptive statistics to compare FY23 promotion results to examine whether they are in line with the Supply Corps community values and convening orders. We use the proportional T-test to determine the statistical significance of the individual variables identified in the Secretary of the Navy convening orders and the Supply Corps community values. As a result, we have determined that the FY23 promotion results were consistent with both the Supply Corps community values and convening orders. Additionally, we also identified statistically significant variables that are not addressed in either document or the subjectivity within the merit reorder process. Future promotion boards can utilize our research to better align messaging and promotion to alleviate the concerns that boards do not pick the best candidates.en_US
dc.description.distributionstatementApproved for public release. Distribution is unlimited.en_US
dc.description.serviceLieutenant Commander, United States Navyen_US
dc.description.serviceLieutenant Commander, United States Navyen_US
dc.description.serviceLieutenant Commander, United States Navyen_US
dc.identifier.curriculumcode815, Defense Contract Management
dc.identifier.curriculumcode815, Defense Contract Management
dc.identifier.curriculumcode837, Defense Financial Management
dc.identifier.thesisid39450
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10945/72501
dc.publisherMonterey, CA; Naval Postgraduate Schoolen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMaster of Business Administration (MBA) Professional Reports
dc.rightsThis publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.en_US
dc.subject.authorsupply officeren_US
dc.subject.authorpromotionen_US
dc.subject.authorcommunity Valuesen_US
dc.titleCOMPARING PROMOTION OUTCOMES FOR NAVY SUPPLY CORPS OFFICERS BY COMMUNITY VALUESen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.typeMBA Professional Projecten_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
etd.thesisdegree.disciplineDefense Contract Managementen_US
etd.thesisdegree.disciplineMaster of Business Administrationen_US
etd.thesisdegree.disciplineDefense Financial Managementen_US
etd.thesisdegree.grantorNaval Postgraduate Schoolen_US
etd.thesisdegree.levelMastersen_US
etd.thesisdegree.levelMastersen_US
etd.thesisdegree.levelMastersen_US
etd.thesisdegree.nameMaster of Science in Defense Contract Managementen_US
etd.thesisdegree.nameMaster of Business Administrationen_US
etd.thesisdegree.nameMaster of Science in Defense Financial Managementen_US
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationb8b0094c-45b5-4a6a-8813-f61a5dec4f2a
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryb8b0094c-45b5-4a6a-8813-f61a5dec4f2a
relation.isSeriesOfPublicatione0c365f0-ed04-4d27-bded-11759168d050
relation.isSeriesOfPublication.latestForDiscoverye0c365f0-ed04-4d27-bded-11759168d050
Files
Collections