Analysis of the Effect of Porous Wall Interference on Transonic Airfoil Flutter

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Authors
Castro, B.M.
Jones, K.D.
Ekaterinaris, J.A.
Platzer, M.F.
Subjects
Advisors
Date of Issue
2001
Date
2001
Publisher
Language
Abstract
A numerical investigation of the influence of the wind tunnel walls on the transonic, two-degree-of-freedom, bending/torsion, flutter characteristics of the NLR7301 section is carried out in the time domain. A parallelized, implicit, time-accurate, two-dimensional, compressible, thin-layer Navier-Stokes flow-solver is coupled with a two-degree-of-freedom structural model. A three-block deforming grid is used for the discretization of the domain including the airfoil and wind tunnel walls. Two types of porous-wall boundary-conditions are implemented and tested for the boundaries representing the tunnel walls. The first applies a porous, inviscid boundary condition and the second applies a porous, viscous one. The type of porous boundary condition is found to significantly influence both steady and unsteady solutions. Computed pressure distribution for steady, transonic flow show better agreement with the experimental results when a viscous, porous boundary condition is applied at the wind tunnel walls. Results show that the free-flight flutter behavior may differ significantly from the behavior found in a porous wind tunnel because of the strong dependence on the tunnel porosity parameter and the proximity of the walls.
Type
Conference Paper
Description
AIAA Paper No. 2001-2725, Anaheim, California, June 2001.
Series/Report No
Department
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
Organization
Identifiers
NPS Report Number
Sponsors
Funder
Format
Citation
Castro, B.M., Jones, K.D., Ekaterinaris, J.A. and Platzer, M.F., "Analysis of the Effect of Porous Wall Interference on Transonic Airfoil Flutter," AIAA Paper No. 2001-2725, Anaheim, California, June 2001.
Distribution Statement
Rights
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.
Collections