KEEPING THE SPIRIT ALIVE: MAKING SENSIBLE CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORMS
Loading...
Authors
Maas, Ari L.
Subjects
criminal justice
policy
reforms
police
bail
public safety
criminal justice policy
policy
reforms
police
bail
public safety
criminal justice policy
Advisors
Brannan, David W.
Halladay, Carolyn C.
Date of Issue
2024-09
Date
Publisher
Monterey, CA; Naval Postgraduate School
Language
Abstract
In the late 2010s, many states began reforming their criminal justice systems to make them more equitable. Some of these policies, however, have had unintended consequences which have inadvertently decreased public safety. This thesis explores how the United States should be careful as to not create policies that increase crime and decrease quality of life for law-abiding citizens while attempting to create policies that are more equitable. Using the research methodology of case studies and policy analysis, this thesis assesses crime reform policies such as the ending of broken windows policing, Proposition 47, and others, showing a link between the reforms, an increase in crime, and a degradation of quality of life. Many criminal justice reforms aim to achieve greater fairness for all. The policy to eliminate cash bail was intended to prevent the poor from being incarcerated simply because they could not afford bail. However, this policy also allowed dangerous individuals to reoffend while awaiting trial. Other criminal justice reforms similarly have good intent, yet unintentionally allow criminals to commit more crime without consequences. This thesis concludes that although an equitable criminal justice system is one of the most important goals of the system, public safety must be the overall driving concern. Any reforms to the system must not unintentionally decrease public safety.
Type
Thesis
Description
Series/Report No
Department
Organization
Identifiers
NPS Report Number
Sponsors
Funder
Format
Citation
Distribution Statement
Distribution Statement A. Approved for public release: Distribution is unlimited.
Rights
�Copyright�is reserved by the copyright owner.