Instrument comparison: corrected stellar scintillometer versus isoplanometer

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Authors
Krause-Polstorff, J.
Murphy, Edmund A.
Walters, Donald L.
Subjects
Advisors
Date of Issue
1993-07
Date
Publisher
Optical Society of America
Language
Abstract
The scintillation pattern from a single star can be utilized to provide information on the refractive turbulence along the line of sight. Instruments that provide refractive turbulence parameters are the isoplanometer and the stellar scintillometer. Attention is drawn to the fact that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration theoretical treatment and implementation of the stellar scintillometer is incomplete. The theory is corrected for spectral effects and finite aperture. A comparison is made of simultaneously obtained isoplanometer values and stellar scintillometer-derived values for isoplanatic angle. The measurements are obtained from an electro-optical/meteorological experiment conducted at Pennsylvania State University in April and May 1986. An atmospheric drop-off model is used to extrapolate the scintillometer measurements beyond the heights probed. Agreement between the two instruments is significantly improved after the appropriate corrections are applied to the scintillometer data. These data were obtained during widely varying meteorological conditions that provided the opportunity for comparisons over a wide range of isoplanatic angles (3 to 14 ,rad). Over the 5 days that data were obtained, relative percent departures of mean isoplanatic angles derived from the corrected stellar scintillometer are within 10% of the mean isoplanometer isoplanatic angle values. The uncorrected departures range from 16% to 24%.
Type
Article
Description
Applied Optics, Volume 32, No. 21, pp. 4051-4057 (20 July 1993)
Series/Report No
Department
Organization
Identifiers
NPS Report Number
Sponsors
Funder
Format
Citation
Distribution Statement
Rights
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.
Collections