Reconsidering publicness in alliance defence expenditures: NATO expansion and burden sharing
Loading...
Authors
Gates, William
Terasawa, Katsuaki
Advisors
Second Readers
Subjects
Burden Sharing
Defense Alliances
NATO
Public Goods
Defense Alliances
NATO
Public Goods
Date of Issue
2003-10
Date
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Language
Abstract
Over the past several decades, NATO allies have debated the relative burdens and benefits of NATO membership. Recently, this concern surfaced as members debated the magnitude and distribution of NATO expansion costs. This paper presents an economic model of defence alliances to identify the benefits and burdens of alliance membership. It suggests that defence expenditures provide public benefits if alliance members share common interests and mutual commitment; defence expenditures provide private benefits if countries lack common interests and mutual commitment. The model’s results are used to discuss NATO’s evolving roles and missions, NATO expansion and burden sharing across NATO members.
Type
Article
Description
The article of record as published may be found at https://doi.org/10.1080/10242690302924
Series/Report No
Department
Identifiers
NPS Report Number
Sponsors
Funding
Format
15 p.
Citation
William Gates & Katsuaki Terasawa (2003) Reconsidering publicness in alliance defence expenditures: NATO expansion and burden sharing, Defence and Peace Economics, 14:5, 369-383
Distribution Statement
Rights
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.
