Risk Reduction and Deterrence: Two Sides of the Same Coin?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Authors
Taquechel, Eric
Subjects
Advisors
Date of Issue
2021-04
Date
Publisher
Monterey, CA; Naval Postgraduate School Center for Homeland Defense and Security
Language
Abstract
Government documents and academic articles focus on risk reduction and deterrence, sometimes simultaneously. With limited resources, how should CIKR stakeholders invest? If the objective is to deter, that may have certain implications for investment. If the objective is to reduce risk, that may have different implications. However, what if the objective is to account for both? What are the investment implications in that case? If CIKR stakeholders understand how deterrence metrics influence risk-reduction efforts, they may view investment in CIKR protection and resilience differently. In addition, this may have implications for risk- reduction metrics reporting, a government concern. This work therefore explores the relationship between quantitative deterrence and quantitative CIKR risk reduction under a variety of assumptions and with notional scenarios and data.
Type
Article
Description
The article record as published may be found at https://www.hsaj.org/articles/16993
Department
Identifiers
NPS Report Number
Sponsors
Funder
Format
Citation
Taquechel, Eric. “Risk Reduction and Deterrence: Two Sides of the Same Coin.” Homeland Security Affairs 17, Article 3 (April 2021) www.hsaj.org/articles16993.
Distribution Statement
Rights
The copyright of all articles published in Homeland Security Affairs rests with the author[s] of the articles. Any commercial use of Homeland Security Affairs or the articles published herein is expressly prohibited without the written consent of the copyright holder. Anyone can copy, distribute, or reuse these articles as long as the author and original source are properly cited.
Collections