Sectarian dilemmas in Iranian foreign policy: when strategy and identity politics collide
Loading...
Authors
Ostovar, Afshon
Advisors
Second Readers
Subjects
Date of Issue
2016-11
Date
November 2016
Publisher
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Language
Abstract
The Islamic Republic’s foreign policy is a product of its self-interest. Striving
to protect Iran’s Islamic theocracy from external threats drives the country’s
approach to foreign affairs. That approach can, at times, look aggressive or
pragmatic. A sectarian angle also exists. Given its relative alienation from its
neighbors since the 1979 revolution, Iran has relied on a strategy of forming
relationships with nonstate groups to help promote its strategic interests.
Although it supports Sunni groups, such as the Palestinian Islamic Jihad and
Hamas, Iran’s backing of Shia organizations has most angered its neighbors.
That practice, often fused with the unofficial policy of exporting the revolution,
has paid dividends for Iran strategically but has also hardened perceptions
of its confessional bias.
Type
Article
Description
Series/Report No
Department
National Security Affairs (NSA)
Organization
Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.)
Identifiers
NPS Report Number
Sponsors
Funding
This paper was published through a generous research grant from the Henry Luce Foundation.
Format
40 p.
Citation
Afshon Ostovar. Sectarian Dilemmas in Iranian Foreign Policy: When Strategy and Identity Politics Collide. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2016. [3]http://carnegieendowment.org/2016/11/30/sectarian-dilemmas-in-iranian-foreign-policy-when-strategy-and-identity-politics-collide-pub-66288
Distribution Statement
Rights
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.
