Performance characterization of swept ramp obstacle fields in pulse detonation applications

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Authors
Dvorak, William T.
Advisors
Brophy, Christopher M.
Second Readers
Gannon, Anthony J.
Subjects
Pulse Detonation
PDE
Transient Plasma Ignition
TPI
Swept Ramp Obstacles
CDF
Ion Probe Measurement
Pressure Loss
Date of Issue
2010-03
Date
March 2010
Publisher
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
Language
Abstract
Pulse Detonation technology offers the potential for substantial increases in thrust and fuel efficiency in subsonic and supersonic flight Mach ranges through the use of a detonative vs. deflagrative combustion process. One of the approaches to reliably obtain a fuel-air detonation is to accelerate a deflagration combustion wave to detonation through the use of turbulence devices, known as detonation-to-deflagration transition. Current geometries for deflagration-to-detonation transition sacrifice much of the gains through losses from high velocity flows over obstacle fields required for detonation initiation. In this study, experimental swept ramp obstacle fields were characterized in an effort to realize decreased pressure losses while still creating the gas dynamic and turbulence necessary for detonation initiation. Characterization included measurement of pressure loss across the combustor during "cold flow" operation with no ignition or fuel present, and detonability testing that employed ion probe measurement of combustion wave velocity. Minimizing pressure losses existing in current designs will result in dramatic improvement of system performance. In addition to swept ramp fields, other configurations were analyzed using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and subjected to performance testing. Of particular interest were obstacles of similar blockage area, but without the swept sides associated with streamwise vorticity in the flow field. Testing of unswept configurations allowed insight into the mechanisms for DDT and narrowed the field of practical obstacle geometries.
Type
Thesis
Description
Series/Report No
Department
Astronautical Engineering
Organization
Identifiers
NPS Report Number
Sponsors
Funding
Format
xvi, 79 p. : ill. ; 28 cm.
Citation
Distribution Statement
Rights
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.
Collections