A Reduced Form Model of Cost Growth of Major Defense Acquisition Programs

Thumbnail Image
Files
SYM-AM-19-083.pdf (423.26 KB)
Authors
McNicol, David L.
Subjects
Advisors
Date of Issue
2019-04-30
Date
Publisher
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
Language
Abstract
This paper considers a problem posed implicitly by comparing a basic assumption typically used in quantitative analyses of cost growth of major defense acquisition programs (MDAPs) with that used in David L. McNicol, Acquisition Policy, Cost Growth, and Cancellations of Major Defense Acquisition Programs, IDA Report R 8396, September 2018 (hereafter Acquisition Policy). An analysis in the traditional mold mainly uses program characteristics (such as the maturity of key technologies) to explain cost growth. Acquisition Policy instead uses a categorical variable for funding climate, categorical variables marking major changes in acquisition policy, and measures of program duration. At first glance, these two approaches seem to adopt radically different theories of the causes of cost growth in MDAPs. In fact, they do not. The paper demonstrates this by deriving the model of Acquisition Policy from a more complete model in which the traditional model is a structural equation. In terms of the more complete model, that of Acquisition Policy is the reduced form representation of the traditional model.
Type
Report
Description
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10945/62925
Series/Report No
Department
Organization
Identifiers
NPS Report Number
SYM-AM-19-083
Sponsors
Naval Postgraduate School Acquisition Research Program
Funding
Format
Citation
Distribution Statement
Rights
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.
Collections
Conferences