The Eye and the Fist: Optimizing Search and Interdiction
Loading...
Authors
Kress, Moshe
Royset, Johannes O.
Rozen, N.
Subjects
Advisors
Date of Issue
2010-06-24
Date
June 24, 2010
Publisher
Language
Abstract
Interdiction operations involving search, identification, and interception of suspected objects are of great interest and high operational importance to miiitary and naval forces as well as nation's coast guards and border patrols. The interdiction scenario discussed in this paper includes an area of interest with multiple neutral and hostile objects moving through this area, and an interdiction force, consisting of an airborne sensor and an intercepting surface vessel or ground vehicle, whose objectives are to search, identify, track and intercept hostile objects within a given time frame. The main contributions of this paper are addressing both airborne sensor and surface vessel simultaneously, developing a stochastic dynamic-programming model for optimizing their employment, and deriving operational insight. In addition, the search and identification process of the airborne sensor addresses both physical (appearance) and behavioral (movement pattern) signatures of a potentially hostile object. As the model is computationally intractable for real-world scenarios, we propose a simple heuristic policy, which is shown, using a bounding technique, to be quite effective. Based on a numerical case study of maritime interdiction operations, which includes several representative scenarios, we show that the expected number of intercepted hostile objects,following the heuristic decision policy, is at least 60% of the number of hostile objects intercepted following an optimal decision policy.
Type
Article
Description
European Journal of Operational Research, V. 220, No. 2, pp 550-558.
Series/Report No
Department
Operations Research (OR)
Organization
Identifiers
NPS Report Number
Sponsors
Funding
Format
Citation
M. Kress, J.O. Royset, and N. Rozen, 2012, "The Eye and the Fist: Optimizing Search and Interdiction," European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 220, No. 2, pp. 550-558.
Distribution Statement
Rights
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.