Maritime operations centers with integrated and isolated planning teams
Loading...
Authors
Hutchins, Susan G.
Kemple, William G.
Kleinman, David L.
Miller, Scot
Pfeiffer, Karl
Horn, Zachary
Weil, Shawn
Entin, Elliot
Advisors
Second Readers
Subjects
Date of Issue
2010-06-22
Date
Publisher
Language
Abstract
The Maritime Operations Center (MOC) was designed to effectively utilize the planning elements of Future Operations (FOPS) to provide more rapid, accurate resource allocations consistent with the vision of the Commander. MOC staff simultaneously participate in the planning effort, while executing the current operation, and supporting headquarters during planning and execution. Frequently, an operational planning team (OPT) – a task-organized team formed to conduct integrated planning for a specific mission – is formed by the MOC because it offers the advantage of a focused group of subject matter experts approaching the problem in an integrated manner. However, performance problems may be realized with the OPT being isolated in situations that require the OPT to coordinate closely with the rest of the MOC. An experiment was conducted in which the MOC planned with either an integrated or an isolated planning team where the (1) FOPS team was supported by a decision aid/planning tool that fosters coordination or (2) FOPS team used a planning tool with a reduced coordination capability. In line with the theme of this year’s symposium – The Evolution of C2 – this paper describes an experiment conducted to gain insight into advantages and disadvantages associated with formng an OPT.
Type
Article
Presentation
Presentation
Description
Series/Report No
Department
Information Science
Organization
Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.)
Identifiers
NPS Report Number
Sponsors
Funding
Format
Citation
Distribution Statement
Rights
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.
