Defeating David : looking beyond a matched strategy

Download
Author
Kotula, Kevin R.
Richardson, Timothy L.
Date
2011-12Advisor
Borer, Douglas
Second Reader
Freeman, Michael
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This thesis builds upon existing contemporary theories that attempt to explain the outcomes of asymmetric conflict. Specifically, this thesis uses Ivan Arreguin-Toft's Strategic Interaction Theory as a baseline to identify theoretical gaps that can not only help further explain asymmetric conflict outcomes, but also provide insight into developing the proper strategy for strong actors. Arreguin-Toft contends that when the strong actor employs the correct strategy then it will win over 75 percent of conflicts against a materially weaker adversary. This leads to a fundamental question: if the strong actor uses the correct strategy against a weaker opponent, then why do strong actors still lose nearly 25 percent of the time? In an effort to identify other key variables that help explain non-conventional war outcomes, this thesis evaluates case studies where the strong actor both won and lost an asymmetric conflict after choosing the correct strategy. This study finds two other factors that are important to achieving victory in an asymmetric conflict. First, the strong actor must have a viable indigenous political authority to work by, with and through. This concept has little to do with political legitimacy. Instead, it focuses on the capacity of the host nation, with strong actor assistance, to synchronize its military and political effort to defeat the insurgency. Second, the strong actor must not only use restraint in applying direct military power, but it must also use the correct force: a cadre that is trained in conducting irregular warfare. As such, this thesis' conclusions are aligned with the belief that it is the host nation's war to win or lose-adhering to this principle provides the strong actor with the best chance of "defeating David" before losing its political will.
Rights
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
PREDICTING THE OUTCOMES OF ASYMMETRIC WARS
El Khoury, Jihad A.; Lapp, Andres (Monterey, CA; Naval Postgraduate School, 2018-06);In the literature on asymmetric warfare, a great deal of disagreement and contradictory theories have arisen concerning factors affecting the outcomes of war. In an attempt to resolve the discrepancies among these theories, ... -
Why so conventional? America's propensity to wage traditional large-scale warfare
Balint, Matthew S. (Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School, 2013-12);The United States has repeatedly engaged in irregular warfareincluding counterinsurgency, foreign internal defense, and unconventional warfarethroughout its history. However, despite its familiarity with irregular warfare, ... -
Deep convection in elliptical and polygonal eyewalls of tropical cyclones: Deep Convection of Polygonal Eyewalls
Kuo, Hung-Chi; Cheng, Wei-Yi; Yang, Yi-Ting; Hendricks, Eric A.; Peng, Melinda S. (AGU, 2017);In observations, tropical cyclones with cyclonically rotating elliptical eyewalls are often characterized by wave number 2 (WN2) deep convection located at the edge of the major axis. A simple modeling framework is used ...