Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHale, Darren Russell.
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-14T17:32:51Z
dc.date.available2012-03-14T17:32:51Z
dc.date.issued2005-08
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10945/1722
dc.description.abstractThis thesis project compares the performance of a homogeneous sample of United States Navy Bachelor Enlisted Quarters built using the Military Construction process. Projects will be broken into two sub-samples of design/bid/build and design/build projects to see if one project delivery method is superior in regards to time and cost. Project duration, project duration per bed, project time growth, cost growth and cost per bed will be statistically compared. Upon completion of the analysis the hypothesis that design/build projects are superior to design/bid/build projects in regards to time and cost will be tested.en_US
dc.description.urihttp://archive.org/details/anempiricalcompa109451722
dc.format.extent1 CD-ROM ;en_US
dc.rightsApproved for public release, distribution unlimiteden_US
dc.subject.lcshLogistics, Military Facilities and Suppliesen_US
dc.subject.lcshAdministration and Managementen_US
dc.subject.lcshEconomics and Cost Analysisen_US
dc.subject.lcshConstructionen_US
dc.subject.lcshCostsen_US
dc.subject.lcshNaval shore facilitiesen_US
dc.titleAn empirical comparison of design/build and design/bid/build project delivery methodsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.corporateUniversity of Texas at Austin
dc.description.funderContract number: N62271-97-G-0073.en_US
dc.identifier.oclc2820
etd.thesisdegree.nameM.S.en_US
etd.thesisdegree.levelMastersen_US
etd.thesisdegree.disciplineEngineeringen_US
etd.thesisdegree.grantorUniversity of Texas at Austinen_US
etd.verifiednoen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record