The effects of Department of Defense and federal spending upon state economic growth
Anastos, Ernest G.
Solnick, Loren M.
Mehay, Stephen L.
MetadataShow full item record
This thesis evaluates the impact of spending by the Department of Defense and the Federal Government upon the economic growth of the states in which funds are expended. A pooled cross-section and time-series analysis is performed on a data base describing the period 1976-1985 and including the forty-eight contiguous states. Personal income is used as a proxy to measure economic growth. The econometric models are estimated using three separate regression methodologies. Consistent parameter estimates permit the author to conclude that Defense Investment spending is highly associated with economic growth. Defense Expense spending is less highly associated with growth. Federal spending other than for defense or intergovernmental aid to state and local governments exhibits an inconclusive relationship with economic growth.
RightsThis publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Looney, Robert E.; Frederiksen, Peter C. (1993);During the 1980s both defense spending and arms imports declined in many developing countries (DCs), especially in the Middle East and to a lesser degree in South Asia and Northern Africa1 • In large part, the reductions ...
Formulating a plan for economic diversification in defense dependent communities: establishing a model for stability, growth and development Millner, Timothy L. (2002);This project studies economic dependency on defense spending in certain communities and formulates methods to help those localities diversify their economies. The project asks whether such communities should pursue a more ...
Looney, Robert E.; Fredericksen, P.C. (1986-12);This study reexamines the relationship between growth and defense spending in developing countries. It differs from previous studies as it recognizes differences in the borrowing capacity of each country. We hypothesize ...