Terrorism, Networks, and Strategy: Why the Conventional Wisdom is Wrong
MetadataShow full item record
This is an article from the June 2008 [v.4 no.2] edition of the Homeland Security Affairs Journal. In this report, the author considers first some basic differences among organizations and the strengths and weaknesses of two different organizational forms [networks and hierarchies]; then apply this organizational analysis to terrorist organizations and the governmental network in the United States; and, finally, suggest optimal strategies for countering the terrorist threats we face. The initial discussion of organizational forms will be somewhat simplified [e.g., it assumes a clear distinction between networks and hierarchies that is ultimately untenable] in order to emphasize certain organizational characteristics or tendencies.
This article appeared in Homeland Security Affairs (June 2008), v.4 no. 2
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Hafsia, Raouf. (2001-03);Ad hoc wireless networks are decentralized networks whose members join and leave the network in an asynchronous manner and for short periods of time. Each node participating in the network acts both as host and a router ...
Alderson, David; Ubiquity Staff (Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 2009-08);Since Duncan Watts and Steve Strogatz published “Collective Dynamics of Small-World Networks” in Nature in 1998, there has been an explosion of interest in mathematical models of large networks, leading to numerous research ...
Torner, Linus P. (Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School, 2015-09);Several recent terrorist attacks in Western countries have highlighted the need for strategies to disrupt dark networks, and social network analysis (SNA) has proven to be a useful tool for analyzing network structure and ...