Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWormuth, Christine
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Jeremy
dc.date2009-01
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-03T16:26:47Z
dc.date.available2013-01-03T16:26:47Z
dc.date.issued2009-01-00
dc.identifier.citationHomeland Security Affairs (January 2009), v.5 no.1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10945/25031
dc.descriptionThis article appeared in Homeland Security Affairs (January 2009), v.5 no.1en_US
dc.description.abstractAt the federal level, homeland security is inherently and fundamentally an interagency undertaking. The quality of interagency relationships and processes is central to the success or failure of federal ''' and national ''' homeland security activities. Short of giving a single Cabinet secretary directive authority over other Cabinet secretaries during major domestic incidents, the only way to ensure effective unity of effort at the federal level is to exercise strong leadership from the White House. This kind of leadership is needed not just during an actual catastrophe but also when the government is engaged in the day-to-day activities of working to prevent, protect against, and prepare for such catastrophes. In recent years the White House has not played this role, in large part because of the bifurcation of national security issues into a National Security Council and a Homeland Security Council. This article thus suggests that one of the most important and necessary changes the new administration should make is to merge these organizations into a single council with a largely shared professional staff.en_US
dc.publisherMonterey, California. Naval Postgraduate Schoolen_US
dc.publisherCenter for Homeland Defense and Securityen_US
dc.rightsApproved for public release, distribution unlimiteden_US
dc.titleMerging the HSC and NSC: Stronger Togetheren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record