Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorEitelberg, Mark J.
dc.contributor.advisorElster, Richard S.
dc.contributor.authorKear, William James
dc.dateDecember 1989
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-23T21:57:19Z
dc.date.available2013-01-23T21:57:19Z
dc.date.issued1989-12
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10945/26285
dc.description.abstractThis thesis seeks to determine if there is a relationship between ship type and first-term enlisted attrition in the Surface Warfare Navy. The data used in this thesis were taken from the Department of Defense (DOD) Enlisted Master Record (EMR) . Information on male sailors aboard ships with 33 months or less of completed service was extracted from the EMR. Three cohorts were examined—those who joined their first ship in fiscal 1977, 1981, and 1985, respectively. A total of 77,502 personnel serving in 300 ships were analyzed in three data formats: individual ship, ship class, and ship mission category. The results revealed wide variation in attrition rates between individual ships and respective ship classes across different cohorts. In addition, a distinct trend in attrition was observed between ships in different mission categories. For example, oilers generally had the highest rate of attrition across all three cohorts--followed (in order) by amphibious ships, minesweepers, and repair ships with cruisers, destroyers, and frigates having the lowest rate. Further research is recommended to determine the causes for differences in attrition between ship types. Understanding this aspect of enlisted attrition may further aid Navy manpower planners and leaders in reducing personnel attrition and its consequences for the Surface Warfare Navy.
dc.description.urihttp://archive.org/details/surfacewarfarett1094526285
dc.format.extent134 p.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherMonterey, California. Naval Postgraduate Schoolen_US
dc.rightsThis publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.
dc.titleSurface warfare attrition: does ship type make a difference?en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.corporateNaval Postgraduate School (U.S.)
dc.contributor.departmentAdministrative Sciences
dc.subject.authorenlisted attritionen_US
dc.subject.authorsurface warfare attritionen_US
dc.subject.authorfirst-term attritionen_US
dc.description.serviceLieutenant Commander, United States Navy
etd.thesisdegree.nameM.S. in Managementen_US
etd.thesisdegree.levelMastersen_US
etd.thesisdegree.disciplineManagementen_US
etd.thesisdegree.grantorNaval Postgraduate Schoolen_US
dc.description.distributionstatementApproved for public release; distribution is unlimited.


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record