Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorAgrawal, Brij N.
dc.contributor.authorFeuerstein, Mark G.
dc.dateJune, 1994
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-26T18:59:08Z
dc.date.available2013-04-26T18:59:08Z
dc.date.issued1994-06
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10945/30852
dc.description.abstractThis paper compares the use of Phase Lead control and Integral control methods to the Positive Position Feedback (PPF) method of suppressing the primary and secondary modes of vibration of a flexible structure. The basic characteristics of piezoelectric sensors and actuators are reviewed. Integral, Phase Lead, and PPF control methods of interest are. also reviewed. The Integral and Phase Lead control methods prove to be comparable to that of PPF while offering a simpler implementation.en_US
dc.description.urihttp://archive.org/details/acomparisonofdif1094530852
dc.format.extent49 p.;28 cm.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherMonterey, California. Naval Postgraduate Schoolen_US
dc.rightsThis publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, may not be copyrighted.en_US
dc.titleA comparison of different control methods for vibration suppression of flexible structures using piezoelectric actuatorsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.secondreaderNA
dc.contributor.corporateNA
dc.contributor.departmentAstronautical Engineering
dc.subject.authorNAen_US
dc.description.funderNAen_US
dc.description.recognitionNAen_US
dc.description.serviceU.S. Navy (U.S.N.) author.en_US
etd.thesisdegree.nameM.S. Astronautical Engineeringen_US
etd.thesisdegree.levelMastersen_US
etd.thesisdegree.disciplineAstronautical Engineeringen_US
etd.thesisdegree.grantorNaval Postgraduate Schoolen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record