Motivations for nuclear terrorism in the United States
DiPaolo, Peter Joseph
MetadataShow full item record
The demise of bipolarity created new security concerns for the United States. Terrorism now thrives in the new world environment. While much has been written on terrorism, the specter of nuclear terrorism in the United States has received little attention. Nuclear terrorism cannot be looked at through the traditional nuclear weapons paradigm nor can it be viewed within the confines of the traditional terrorism paradigm. There currently are two perspectives on nuclear terrorism: the optimists, who do not see it as a threat, and the pessimists, who see it as inevitable. Each view has its merits but neither alone can explain this security concern. Merging of the two views is required to understand the motivational considerations behind this potentially horrific problem. A brief history of U.S. policies on nuclear weapons and terrorism is offered to explain why there has not been a U.S. policy on nuclear terrorism. The possibility of nuclear terrorism is real. A better understanding of the nuclear terrorist mindset is required if effective policies are to be developed.
RightsThis publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Woods, Matthew E. (Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 1996-09);WMD terrorism is a new concern. The United States is preparing for the possibility of terrorist attacks involving chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons, but the scope of these preparations is too narrow. This thesis ...
Geelhood, Philip. (Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 2009-12);As nuclear terrorism is a risk of low probability and high consequences, the United States is right to address it as a significant--but not the utmost--national security priority. The science of nuclear forensics makes ...
Geelhood, Philip (Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 2009-12);As nuclear terrorism is a risk of low probability and high consequences, the United States is right to address it as a significant--but not the utmost--national security priority. The science of nuclear forensics makes ...