Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorStockton, P.
dc.contributor.advisorAbenheim, D.
dc.contributor.authorMalashchenko, Vitaliy B.
dc.dateDecember, 1996
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-30T22:04:22Z
dc.date.available2013-04-30T22:04:22Z
dc.date.issued1996-12
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10945/32007
dc.description.abstractThis thesis examines the evolution of post-Cold War U.S. policy towards NATO as a case study of the way in which domestic and international pressures interact to shape security policy. I argue that the expansion of U.S. commitments to post-Cold War Europe corresponds to the way key U.S. policymaking institutions have framed American national interests. President Clinton, his key advisers and Republican leaders of Congress emphasize that NATO enlargement advances American interests by accelerating the success of democratic and market economy reforms in Eastern European countries and Russia. But NATO enlargement also serves a more defensive mission -- that of pushing back threats to the West from the East. The process that led to this definition of U.S. interests reflects the flexibility of the U.S. decisionmaking structure, and the sharing of powers between Congress, the president and other key actors. The interpretation of these national interests, in turn, have been shaped by two factors: geostrategic perspectives and domestic political concerns. Wide agreement has emerged between Congress and the Executive branch that NATO enlargement serves U.S. geostrategic interests. Moreover, at least until now, partisan political conflict over NATO enlargement has remained muted. Such conflicts could grow as new strategic questions emerge with the prospect of enlargement beyond the Vishegrad countries (Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic).en_US
dc.description.urihttp://archive.org/details/usdecisionmaking1094532007
dc.format.extentx, 63 p.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherMonterey, California. Naval Postgraduate Schoolen_US
dc.titleU.S. decisionmaking process on NATO enlargement: implications for East Eurpoean Statesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.recognitionNAen_US
dc.description.serviceUkraine Ministry of Foreign Relations authoren_US
etd.thesisdegree.nameM.S. in Civil-Military Relations and International Securityen_US
etd.thesisdegree.levelMastersen_US
etd.thesisdegree.disciplineCivil-Military Relationsen_US
etd.thesisdegree.disciplineInternational Securityen_US
etd.thesisdegree.grantorNaval Postgraduate Schoolen_US
dc.description.distributionstatementApproved for public release; distribution is unlimited.


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record