Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNPS Acquisition Research Program
dc.datePublished 30 September 2004
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-08T21:09:50Z
dc.date.available2013-05-08T21:09:50Z
dc.date.issued2004-09-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10945/33112
dc.descriptionProceedings of the First Annual Acquisition Research Symposiumen_US
dc.description.abstractMany in the Department of Defense associate the phase ''acquisition reform'' with major policy and legislative initiatives of the past decade, for example, the shift away from reliance on military unique specifications and standards, the emphasis on teaming, the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act (FASA), and the Clinger-Cohen Act.'' While we should never discount the significance of these measures, the view that the 1990s were the genesis of acquisition reform diminishes perspective of the long history of reform efforts linked to names such as Goldwater, Nichols, Grace, Carlucci, Packard, and Hoover, to name but a few.'' Indeed, these efforts extend back in our history to the Continental Congress'' attempts to reform the buying practices of General Washington''s Army.'' Considering this history, ''reform'' may well be acquisition''s defining theme.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe research presented at the symposium was supported by the Acquisition Chair of the Graduate School of Business & Public Policy at the Naval Postgraduate School.
dc.description.sponsorshipNaval Postgraduate School Acquisition Research Programen_US
dc.titleCharting a Course for Change: Acquisition Theory and Practice for a Transforming Defense, May 13, 2004en_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
dc.contributor.departmentAcquisition Management
dc.subject.authorSymposium Proceedingsen_US
dc.identifier.npsreportNPS-AM-04-005
dc.description.distributionstatementApproved for public release; distribution is unlimited.


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record