AEGIS and Ship Self-Defense (SSDS) Platforms: Using KVA Analysis, Risk Simulation and Strategic Real Options to Assess Operational Effectiveness

Download
Author
Uchytil, Joseph
Housel, Thomas
Hom, Sandra
Tarantino, Eric
Mun, Johnathan
Date
2006-09-01Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Modern, analytical tools are critical to understand the impact of open architecture technology and open business models on naval warfighting processes and procedures. These tools must measure the operational value of a system from an end-user, warfighter perspective, identify areas of deficiencies in capabilities, and flag areas for potential acquisitions. One advantage of examining open architected system upgrade options from a warfighter perspective is that the new systems can be integrated with reengineered processes more easily leading to improved process performance. This perspective, using OA to upgrade existing IWS systems, ensures that upgrades will lead to improved warfighting capabilities. Traditional measurement tools used for cost analysis cannot calculate the total value of upgrading a system to support an improved warfighting capability, particularly the improved operational value resulting from reengineering of warfighting processes. The Knowledge Value Added/Real Options (KVA+RO) Valuation Framework is a tool designed to assist decision-makers in making technology acquisitions. This paper describes research using the KVA+RO framework for estimating return on investment, in an open architecture approach, to upgrading and/or replacing aging IWS AEGIS and SSDS systems. The results of the research indicated that using the open architecture (OA)model, in combination with the ''leave and layer'' approach, was approximately five times more valuable than the current proprietary approach to system replacement and was approximately twice as valuable as a complete retrofit and replace strategy. ''Leave and layer'' provided the highest return on investment for replacing the AEGIS system with the lowest risk. The ultimate success of the OA approach is dependent on the ability of the multiple parties to system development and deployment to collaborate. Collaboration, along with the tools that facilitate collaboration, is critical to the success of any of the OA approaches.
Description
Sponsored Report (for Acquisition Research Program)
NPS Report Number
NPS-AM-06-038Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
AEGIS and Ship Self-defense System (SSDS) Platforms: Using KVA Analysis, Risk Simulation and Strategic Real Options to Assess Operational Effectiveness
Housel, Thomas; Tarantino, Eric; Mun, Johnathan (2007-04-01); NPS-AM-07-011Modern, analytical tools are critical to understand the impact of open architecture technology and open business models on naval warfighting processes and procedures. These tools must measure the operational value of a ... -
Optimal Cost Avoidance Investment and Pricing Strategies for Performance-Based Post-Production Service Contracts
Nowicki, David; Ramirez-Marquez, Jose; Randall, Wesley; Murynets, Ilona (Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 2011-04-30); NPS-AM-11-C8P21R01-071Performance-based contracting (PBC) is altering the fundamental relationship between buyers and suppliers engaged in the support of capital-intensive systems such as high-speed rail, defense, and power generation. This ... -
AEGIS and Ship Self-Defense System (SSDS) platforms: using KVA analysis, risk simulation and strategic real options to assess operational effectiveness
Uchytil, Joseph; Housel, Thomas; Hom, Sandra; Mun, Johnathan; Tarantino, Eric (Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 2006); NPS-AM-06-038Modern, analytical tools are critical to understand the impact of open architecture technology and business models on naval warfighting processes and procedures. The Knowledge Value Added/Real Options (KVA+RO) Valuation ...