Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcCaffery, Jerry
dc.contributor.authorJones, Lawrence
dc.date01-Nov-07
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-08T21:14:49Z
dc.date.available2013-05-08T21:14:49Z
dc.date.issued2007-11-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10945/33245
dc.descriptionSponsored Report (for Acquisition Research Program)en_US
dc.description.abstractThis report serves three purposes. Our first purpose is to assess the future of the Planning, Programming, Budgeting and Execution System (PPBES) and related budget reforms and to suggest that it may take more that a marginal adjustment to the current PPBES process to plan and budget most effectively for national defense and weapons acquisition. In this regard, we recommend that the DOD, and the federal government as a whole, adopt a capital budgeting process. The second purpose is to review and assess previous acquisition reforms in DOD, many of which continue into the present. The third purpose is to assess modification of the current acquisition process to improve the business processes imbedded within this system, as well as to make the overall process operate more efficiently.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNaval Postgraduate School Acquisition Research Programen_US
dc.titleBudgeting and Acquisition Business Process Reformen_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
dc.contributor.departmentAcquisition Management
dc.contributor.departmentNPS Faculty
dc.subject.authorBudget Reformen_US
dc.subject.authorPPBES, Budget Reform, Capital Budgeting Process, Acquisition Reformen_US
dc.identifier.npsreportNPS-AM-07-122
dc.description.distributionstatementApproved for public release; distribution is unlimited.


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record