Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrodsky, Lloyd
dc.date01-Apr-09
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-08T21:17:56Z
dc.date.available2013-05-08T21:17:56Z
dc.date.issued2009-04-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10945/33381
dc.descriptionProceedings Paper (for Acquisition Research Program)en_US
dc.descriptionApproved for public release; distribution unlimited.en_US
dc.description.abstractGovernance is widely viewed in the SOA literature as essential to successful SOA deployments. That literature generally draws little distinction between in-house projects and those carried out by contractors. Because the relationship with contractors is negotiated and managed by the acquisition unit, this paper finds it essential that acquisition integrate the decisions of governance both into solicitation documents and the resulting contracts for outsourced development or operations. It identifies what should be in a model SOA contract, paying particular attention to specifying, monitoring, and enforcing service-level agreements and alternative dispute resolution.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNaval Postgraduate School Acquisition Research Programen_US
dc.rightsThis publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.en_US
dc.titleAligning Acquisition Practice with Net-centricity Policyen_US
dc.typeReporten_US
dc.contributor.departmentAcquisition Management
dc.contributor.departmentOther Research Faculty
dc.subject.authorService-oriented Architecture (SOA)en_US
dc.subject.authorService-oriented architecture (SOA), Service-level Agreements (SLAs), Alternative Dispute Resolution, Net-centricity Policyen_US
dc.identifier.npsreportNPS-AM-09-032


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record