Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorLavoy, Peter R.
dc.contributor.advisorClunan, Anne.
dc.contributor.authorStone Bahr, Elizabeth L.
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-14T17:38:31Z
dc.date.available2012-03-14T17:38:31Z
dc.date.issued2007-06
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10945/3483
dc.description.abstractThe possibility of an enemy attack using biological weapons (BW) remains one of the biggest threats to U.S. and global security. U.S. defense and deterrence policies are based on the assumption that the perpetrator can be quickly and reliably identified. If perpetrators can conduct attacks without the fear of attribution or punishment, they can act with impunity. The ability to punish, therefore, rests on the ability to identify the perpetrator. Thus, the goal of attribution is at the root of all national security strategies. Unfortunately, there are three reasons why the attribution of BW attacks are very difficult: (1) the nature of biological weapons, (2) the unique restrictions the international environment places on BW attribution, and (3) the bureaucratic constraints and organizational overlap that domestic political environments can impose if a BW attack occurs. This thesis thus provides a basic epistemological framework for analysisen_US
dc.description.urihttp://archive.org/details/biologicalweapon109453483
dc.format.extentxviii, 119 p. : col. ill., 1 col. map ;en_US
dc.publisherMonterey, California. Naval Postgraduate Schoolen_US
dc.subject.lcshEpidemiologyen_US
dc.subject.lcshAnthraxen_US
dc.subject.lcshBiological warfareen_US
dc.titleBiological weapons attribution a primeren_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.corporateNaval Postgraduate School (U.S.)
dc.description.serviceNaval Postgraduate School author (civilian)en_US
dc.identifier.oclc156950802
etd.verifiednoen_US
dc.description.distributionstatementApproved for public release; distribution is unlimited.


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record