Keeping public officials accountable through dialogue: resolving the accountability paradox
Roberts, Nancy C.
MetadataShow full item record
How can public officials be held accountable, and yet avoid the paradoxes and pathologies of the current mechanisms of accountability? The answer, claims Harmon (1995), is dialogue. But what exactly is dialogue, and how is it created? More importantly, how can dialogue ensure acountability. To address these questions, I begin with a brief description of dialogue and its basic features, distinguishing it from other forms of communication. An example illustrates how dialogue occurs in actual practice. Not only does dialogue demonstrate the intelligent management of contradictory motives and forces, it also supports Harmon's claim that it can resolve the accountability paradox and avoid the atrophy of personal responsibility and political authority. I suggest the dialogue's advantage outweighs its cost as a mechanism of accountability under a particular set of conditions: when public officials confront "wicked problems" that defy defnition and solution, and when traditional problem solving methods have failed, thus preventing any one group from imposing it definition of the problem or its solutions on others.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
International Public Management Network Symposium: "New Public Management Has Been Completely Discredited, Thank God!" Jones, L.R. (2004);In late February 2004, well-known and highly respected Canadian academic Donald Savoie was appointed to assist the Canadian government, "to help overhaul the management and accountability of government in ...
Gergen, Kenneth J.; McNamee, Sheila; Barrett, Frank (2001);Most of us feel more comfortable in certain groups than others, and indeed find certain people just plain wrong headed or evil - perhaps neo-Nazis, the KKK, the Mafia, terrorist groups. This sense of alterity - distance ...
Examining the operational effectiveness and accountability of federal agencies as indicated in the performance and accountability reports required by the Government Performance And Results Act of 1993 Caron, Lenn E.; Underwood, Jeffrey R.; Farricker, Daniel A. (Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 2007-12);The Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA) was enacted to improve the confidence of the American people in the capability of the federal government and to initiate program performance improvement. The ...