Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHenderson, David R.
dc.contributor.advisorRoberts, Nancy C.
dc.contributor.authorEaton, David S.
dc.dateJune 1993
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-26T23:23:14Z
dc.date.available2014-03-26T23:23:14Z
dc.date.issued1993-06
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10945/39785
dc.descriptionApproved for public release; distribution is unlimited.en_US
dc.description.abstractWhile arbitration and mediation have gained almost universal acceptance for settling commercial contract disputes, resolution of contract disputes in the Federal Government has continued to be slow, time consuming, and expensive. The participants in these processes have turned toward a new approach that offers an expedient, inexpensive, and less adversarial method for settling these disputes known as Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). This thesis provides information on various methods of ADR, detailing advantages, disadvantages, and characteristics for case suitability. The research found, through the interviews conducted and the literature reviewed, that there are general misconceptions and impediments to the implementation of ADR. There was a general lack of knowledge of the different methods of ADR available. Many of the personnel interviewed did not know of their full authority to use ADR as provided by the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. One major obstacle that was found in evaluating ADR is that there is an absence of reliable data to support the claims of ADR. Personnel interviewed in the Federal Government indicated that there is a lack of incentives for the Government to use ADR. One reason for this was due to the use of the 'continued performance clause.en_US
dc.format.extent109 p.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherMonterey, California. Naval Postgraduate Schoolen_US
dc.rightsThis publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, may not be copyrighted.en_US
dc.titleAlternative dispute resolution: a viable method for settling government contract disputesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.corporateNaval Postgraduate School (U.S.)
dc.contributor.departmentManagement
dc.subject.authorAlternate dispute resolutionen_US
dc.subject.authorADRen_US
dc.subject.authorArbitrationen_US
dc.subject.authorMediationen_US
dc.subject.authorMini-trialsen_US
dc.subject.authorContract disputesen_US
dc.description.serviceCaptian, United States Marine Corpsen_US
etd.thesisdegree.nameM.S. in Managementen_US
etd.thesisdegree.levelMastersen_US
etd.thesisdegree.disciplineManagementen_US
etd.thesisdegree.grantorNaval Postgraduate Schoolen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Thesis and Dissertation Collection
    Includes the entire collection of publicly accessible NPS Theses, Dissertations and other degree earning works. Other collections here are mapped from this one.

Show simple item record