Improving public perceptions by instilling objectivity in decisions to waive procurement regulations
MetadataShow full item record
The following article is taken as an excerpt from the proceedings of the annual Acquisition Research Program. This annual event showcases the research projects funded through the Acquisition Research Program at the Graduate School of Business and Public Policy at the Naval Postgraduate School. Featuring keynote speakers, plenary panels, multiple panel sessions, a student research poster show and social events, the Annual Acquisition Research Symposium offers a candid environment where high-ranking Department of Defense (DoD) officials, industry officials, accomplished faculty and military students are encouraged to collaborate on finding applicable solutions to the challenges facing acquisition policies and processes within the DoD today. By jointly and publicly questioning the norms of industry and academia, the resulting research benefits from myriad perspectives and collaborations which can identify better solutions and practices in acquisition, contract, financial, logistics and program management. For further information regarding the Acquisition Research Program, electronic copies of additional research, or to learn more about becoming a sponsor, please visit our program website at: www.acquisitionresearch.org. For further information on or to register for the next Acquisition Research Symposium during the third week of May, please visit our conference website at: www.researchsymposium.org.;The general public often perceives the government to be bureaucratic. One reason is that the public perceives that the government too rigidly enforces laws and regulations or that favoritism or bias influences decisions to make exceptions or waivers of rules. Although observed in various contexts, such perception is particularly evident in government contracting and procurement. This perception can erode the public confidence in government; thus, improving the public's perception is paramount. An approach to this perception problem involves instilling objectivity in a government decision to make an exception or waiver of a procurement rule or regulation. Analytical techniques can be used to evaluate the decision of whether or not to waive a particular procurement rule or regulation. Granted, a waiver may be unnecessary in exigent circumstances (where life or health is in imminent danger) because procurements under such exigent circumstances are often exempt from application of procurement rules. Yet, absent such exigent circumstances, a waiver of a particular regulation may require a formal exception by an administrative body, an executive, a court-issued injunction, or even legislation.Third Annual Acquisition Research Symposium
NPS Report NumberNPS-AM-06-067
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Mrak, Douglas J. (Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 1998-12);The Truth in Negotiations Act (TINA) requires that Government contractors provide cost or pricing data for procurements equal to or exceeding $500,000 and certify that such data are accurate, current and complete upon ...
Herrera, Adora R. (Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School, 2014-06);The purpose of this research project was to analyze the impact of the Army’s request to transfer the Army Government Purchase Card (GPC) program in Japan from the Army’s to the Air Force’s reporting and processing hierarchies. ...
Analysis of Air Force Office of Special Investigations Agents' Knowledge of the Contract Management Process George, Mark; Menanno, John (Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 2017-04-27); SYM-AM-17-189The Department of Defense has an annual budget of approximately $495 billion. With so much fiscal resources being spent on supplies, services, and weapons systems, auditability becomes vital to protecting against fraud, ...