The use of alternative dispute resolution techniques in United States Air Force environmental conflicts
Pigeon, Nanci R.
Hudgens, Bryan J.
England, Ellen C.
Mable, Leon A.
MetadataShow full item record
The following article is taken as an excerpt from the proceedings of the annual Acquisition Research Program. This annual event showcases the research projects funded through the Acquisition Research Program at the Graduate School of Business and Public Policy at the Naval Postgraduate School. Featuring keynote speakers, plenary panels, multiple panel sessions, a student research poster show and social events, the Annual Acquisition Research Symposium offers a candid environment where high-ranking Department of Defense (DoD) officials, industry officials, accomplished faculty and military students are encouraged to collaborate on finding applicable solutions to the challenges facing acquisition policies and processes within the DoD today. By jointly and publicly questioning the norms of industry and academia, the resulting research benefits from myriad perspectives and collaborations which can identify better solutions and practices in acquisition, contract, financial, logistics and program management. For further information regarding the Acquisition Research Program, electronic copies of additional research, or to learn more about becoming a sponsor, please visit our program website at: www.acquisitionresearch.org. For further information on or to register for the next Acquisition Research Symposium during the third week of May, please visit our conference website at: www.researchsymposium.org.;The use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in government disputes is mandated by the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of 1990. The use of ADR to resolve disputes typically provides a quick and inexpensive resolution when compared to litigation. The Air Force has a very strong ADR program to resolve acquisition and workplace disputes; however, the varied conditions and situations of environmental issues have prevented the Air Force from achieving similar success in this area. This research analyzes the experiences of twenty-six Environmental Conflict Resolution practitioners who have resolved environmental disputes using ADR techniques. Content analysis and pattern matching were used to provide insight into the current use of ADR techniques in military environmental disputes. The insight gained from this research provides the Air Force with information to better understand the current practices in environmental ADR and also provides areas for further research.Third Annual Acquisition Research Symposium
NPS Report NumberNPS-AM-06-068
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Buss, Terry F.; Cooke, David (Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 2005); NPS-AM-05-042The federal government is becoming increasingly corporate and, consequently, business-like operations are now more prevalent than ever. Part of the mandate to act like a business is a need to develop strategic plans and ...
Apte, Aruna (Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate SchoolGraduate School of Business and Public Policy, 2005); NPS-AM-05-026Many view the Department of Defense's acquisition process as ripe for repair. Shortcomings of predominantly used acquisition approaches, such as the Block approach or Pre-planned Product Improvement (P3I) to fulfill system ...
Determining the best Loci of knowledge, responsibilities and decision rights in major acquisition organizations Dillard, John; Nissen, Mark (Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 2005-05-01); NPS-AM-05-033The DoD is a large, bureaucratic, rule-intensive organization that may not be suited well for its environment. Building upon prior research of acquisition centralization and knowledge dynamics, we employ computational ...