Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGarfinkel, Simson L.
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-09T16:18:47Z
dc.date.available2014-04-09T16:18:47Z
dc.date.issued2008-04-07
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10945/40330
dc.description.abstractHaving decided to focus attention on the “weak link” of human fallibility, a growing number of security researchers are discovering the US Government’s regulations that govern human subject research. This paper discusses those regulations, their application to research on security and usability, and presents strategies for negotiating the Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval process. It argues that a strict interpretation of regulations has the potential to stymie security research.en_US
dc.rightsThis publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.en_US
dc.titleIRBs and Security Research: Myths, Facts and Mission Creepen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record